Using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) to develop rich, subjective insights, the research delves deep into secondary traumatization, going beyond surface observations and capturing the underlying experiences of the participants. The research methodology was carried out by having detailed interviews with six licensed clinicians who have worked within the profession for more than five years of active engagement in their fields. This purposeful sampling provided access to participants with different aspects of STS that vary in terms of demographics, practice areas, and personal backgrounds. Emerging from the literature and interviews, I identified four themes: empathic detachment and depletion, professional self-care practices, emotional and psychological boundaries, and professional support.

My study argues that STS should be better recognized and understood across the helping professions, and comprehensive support is needed to ensure the well—being of integral members of our community. The research underscores the need for ongoing education, appropriate interventions, and preventative measures to address the occupational hazards of secondary trauma, thereby enhancing resilience and effectiveness within the field of helping professionals.